From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mendez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 31, 2022
16 Crim. 584 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

16 Crim. 584 (VM)

03-31-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO MENDEZ, Defendant.


ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court received a pro se letter from defendant Antonio Mendez (“Mendez”), dated March 21, 2022, requesting appointment of new counsel and a copy of the docket sheet for No. 16 Crim. 584. (See Dkt. No. 57.) However, the right to counsel extends only to a criminal defendant's trial and direct appeal, not any subsequent motions for relief. See United States v. Sash, 374 Fed.Appx. 198, 199 (2d Cir. 2010). Further, the Court issued Mendez's judgment on January 31, 2017. (See Dkt. No. 36.) As the Court noted in its September 25, 2020 Order, the deadline for Mendez to file a petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 (“Section 2255”) was February 14, 2018. (See Dkt. No. 56 at 3.) Any new motion for relief pursuant to Section 2255 would be untimely and duplicative. Accordingly, Mendez's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order and to transmit a copy of the Docket Sheet to Antonio Mendez #64003-053, USP Thomson, U.S. Penitentiary, PO Box 1002, Thomson, IL 61285, and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mendez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 31, 2022
16 Crim. 584 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Mendez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO MENDEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

16 Crim. 584 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)