From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McGregor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
No. CR 12-0200 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-0200 WHA

03-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RONALD MCGREGOR, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney CYNTHIA M. FREY Assistant United States Attorney BRANDON LEBLANC Attorney for RONALD MCGREGOR


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
CYNTHIA M. FREY (DCBN 475889)
Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Fax: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: cynthia.frey@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States of America

STIPULATION TO SET MATTER FOR

BENCH TRIAL AND TO EXCLUDE

TIME FROM CALCULATIONS UNDER

THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

(18 U.S.C. § 3161)

The defendant, Ronald McGregor, represented by Brandon Leblanc, Assistant Federal Public Defender, and the government, represented by Cynthia Frey, Assistant United States Attorney, appeared before the Honorable William Alsup on January 15, 2013 for a status conference and trial setting. This Court set this matter for trial on April 8, 2013.

The parties have agreed to proceed by way of a "Stipulation Regarding Bench Trial" and after confirmation with the Courtroom Clerk, the parties have stipulated to set the bench trial for March 20, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. The parties also agree that time should appropriately be excluded for effective preparation of counsel from February 5, 2013 through March 20, 2013, in order to provide defense counsel with adequate time to review additional discovery, conduct additional investigation, and consult with the defendant. In addition, the defendant agrees to exclude for these periods of time any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The parties represent that granting the continuance, is necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). SO STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

____________________

CYNTHIA M. FREY

Assistant United States Attorney

____________________

BRANDON LEBLANC

Attorney for RONALD MCGREGOR

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between February 5, 2013 and March 20, 2013 would unreasonably deny the defendant and counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between February 5, 2013 and March 20, 2013 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The matter be set for a bench trial on March 20, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.; and

(2) the time between February 5, 2013 and March 20, 2013 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

______________________________

HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. McGregor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
No. CR 12-0200 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. McGregor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RONALD MCGREGOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-0200 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)