From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McDonald

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 18, 2024
No. 24-1515 (8th Cir. Oct. 18, 2024)

Opinion

24-1515

10-18-2024

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Tyrae Ronzell McDonald Defendant-Appellant


Unpublished

Submitted: October 15, 2024

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Tyrae McDonald appeals the sentence the district court imposed after he pled guilty to a firearm charge. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging an enhancement included in the calculation of the imprisonment range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual.

The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not err by imposing the enhancement based on grand jury testimony admitted at sentencing. See United States v. Still, 6 F.4th 812, 817-19 (8th Cir. 2021) (noting consideration of grand jury testimony at sentencing has been "repeatedly upheld" given its indicia of reliability); United States v. Asalati, 615 F.3d 1001, 1006 (8th Cir. 2010) (noting "credibility findings are 'virtually unreviewable on appeal'").

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm.


Summaries of

United States v. McDonald

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 18, 2024
No. 24-1515 (8th Cir. Oct. 18, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Tyrae Ronzell McDonald…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 2024

Citations

No. 24-1515 (8th Cir. Oct. 18, 2024)