From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McCray

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 10, 1972
458 F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1972)

Summary

holding there is no right to appeal to the court of appeals from a removal hearing order and observing: “It is doubtful if there was any jurisdiction in the district court to review ... the commissioner's prior approval of the removal.”

Summary of this case from United States v. Saldana-Beltran

Opinion

No. 71-2155.

April 10, 1972.

Edward McCray, in pro. per.

Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Michael Morehouse, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.


The appeal is dismissed because there is no jurisdiction in this court for the appeal.

McCray escaped from the federal penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. Found in Oregon, he was removed to Kansas. He sought to have his removal from Oregon to Kansas set aside.

Direct appeal does not in the pre-trial stage apply to federal removal proceedings. Binion v. United States, 9 Cir., 201 F.2d 498, cert. denied 345 U.S. 935. Also, there is a prohibition in 28 U.S.C. § 2253 of such a review.

It is doubtful if there was any jurisdiction in the district court to review (after McCray was back in Kansas) the commissioner's prior approval of the removal. But that is not our problem.


Summaries of

United States v. McCray

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 10, 1972
458 F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1972)

holding there is no right to appeal to the court of appeals from a removal hearing order and observing: “It is doubtful if there was any jurisdiction in the district court to review ... the commissioner's prior approval of the removal.”

Summary of this case from United States v. Saldana-Beltran
Case details for

United States v. McCray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. EDWARD McCRAY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 10, 1972

Citations

458 F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Saldana-Beltran

A right to appellate review by a district judge would defeat the Congressional purpose of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and…

United States v. Rivero-Nunez

A removal order is not an appealable order. U.S. v. McCray, 458 F.2d 389 (CA9, 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S.…