From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Love

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 13, 1989
867 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-7647.

Argued December 8, 1988.

Decided February 13, 1989. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied March 21, 1989.

William Otis Kneece (Kneece, Kneece, Ashley, Gibbons Kneece, on brief) for defendant-appellant.

David Jarlath Slattery, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Vinton D. Lide, U.S. Atty., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia, Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


Newby Franklin Love has appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate sentence by the District Court of South Carolina. Although the two cases were not consolidated for purposes of appeal, Love's oral argument was heard in this court at the same time as that of Robert Edward Lee, an original co-defendant, and the assignments of error pressed by Love and Lee are substantially identical.

After taking into consideration the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent authorities, we affirm the denial of Love's motion for the reasons fully articulated in the opinion filed in the companion case of United States v. Lee, 867 F.2d 206 (4th Cir. 1989).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Love

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 13, 1989
867 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

United States v. Love

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. NEWBY FRANKLIN LOVE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 1989

Citations

867 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1989)