From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Logan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 25, 2019
Criminal No. CCB-10-203 (D. Md. Jul. 25, 2019)

Summary

In Logan, the defendant's original sentence had also been a downward variance, and the reduced sentence was calculated to produce a downward variance proportional to the original one.

Summary of this case from United States v. Franklin

Opinion

Criminal No. CCB-10-203

07-25-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WAYNE LEROY LOGAN


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Now pending is Wayne Logan's motion for sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018. As the government agreed, Logan is eligible for relief. The question, therefore, is what factors the court should consider in deciding whether to exercise its discretion to reduce Logan's sentence as requested. Having reviewed the parties' memoranda and relevant case law, I join other courts in holding that the judge should consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including post-sentencing conduct, in ruling on a motion for sentence reduction where the defendant is eligible for relief under the First Step Act. See, e.g., United States v. Rose, 379 F. Supp. 3d, 223, 231 (S.D.N.Y. 2019); United States v. Mitchell, 2019 WL 2647571 * 7-8 (D.D.C. 2019).

The government, without directly addressing the § 3553(a) factors, argues by "analogy" to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) that, because Logan's sentence is already 8 months below the revised guideline range, no further reduction should be granted. Section 3582(c)(2), however, is not applicable because the court is ruling pursuant to a statutory change (Section 404 of the First Step Act) rather than a guideline amendment made by the Sentencing Commission. See, e.g., United States v. Dodd, 372 F. Supp. 3d 795, 797-98 (S.D. Iowa 2019); Rose, 379 F. Supp. 3d at 233; United States v. Copeland, 2019 WL 2090699, * 3-4 (W.D. Va. 2019).

In 2010, as a career offender who pled guilty to distribution of over 50 grams of crack cocaine, Logan's guideline range was 262 to 327 months. Pursuant to a c-plea, he received a sentence of 180 months from now-retired Judge William D. Quarles. Logan's new guideline range is 188-235 months. --------

In this case the § 3553(a) factors weigh in Logan's favor. He is 58 years old, lowering the risk of recidivism. His offense did not involve violence. He has done well in the Bureau of Prisons and has both family support and employment waiting for him upon release. The additional reduction is warranted.

Accordingly, the motion (ECF No. 50) is granted. The sentence will be reduced by a proportional downward variance to 130 months (but not less than time served plus 10 days) and 4 years of supervised release. An amended J&C will be issued.

So Ordered this 25th day of July 2019.

/s/_________

Catherine C. Blake

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Logan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 25, 2019
Criminal No. CCB-10-203 (D. Md. Jul. 25, 2019)

In Logan, the defendant's original sentence had also been a downward variance, and the reduced sentence was calculated to produce a downward variance proportional to the original one.

Summary of this case from United States v. Franklin
Case details for

United States v. Logan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WAYNE LEROY LOGAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Jul 25, 2019

Citations

Criminal No. CCB-10-203 (D. Md. Jul. 25, 2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. Watts

In determining whether the Court should reduce Watts's sentence, it turns to the 18 U.S.C. §3553(a) factors…

United States v. Washington

Even had Washington established an extraordinary and compelling reason entitling him to further…