Summary
remanding to district court for the limited purpose of obtaining written reasons why the court denied the defendant's motion to revoke the order of detention
Summary of this case from United States v. SlaughterOpinion
No. 15-20386
08-19-2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HERIBERTO LATIGO, Defendant-Appellant
Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-295-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------
Heriberto Latigo appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to revoke the magistrate judge's order of detention pending his trial on criminal stalking charges. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3142, 3145. Under Rule 9(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a "district court must state in writing, or orally on the record, the reasons for an order regarding the release or detention of a defendant in a criminal case." To date, the district court has not given its reasons for denying Latigo's motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the district court for the limited purpose of obtaining written reasons for the denial of Latigo's motion to revoke the order of detention.