From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kubinski

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 28, 2017
No. 17-7171 (4th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-7171

12-28-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH B. KUBINSKI, Defendant - Appellant.

Kenneth B. Kubinski, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00028-H-1) Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth B. Kubinski, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth B. Kubinski appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to remove a factual statement from the presentence report associated with his 1994 convictions. Rule 36 motions, however, apply only to clerical errors and are not the proper vehicle for challenging the substance of the information in a presentence report; such challenges must be filed within 14 days of receiving the report. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Kubinski

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 28, 2017
No. 17-7171 (4th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Kubinski

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH B. KUBINSKI…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 28, 2017

Citations

No. 17-7171 (4th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

United States v. Vanderhorst

Rather, any challenges to a PSR should be filed within fourteen days of receiving the document." Id. (citing…

United States v. Phipps

"[A] clerical error must not be one of judgment or even of misidentification, but merely of recitation, of…