From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kemner

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 25, 1978
578 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 78-1697. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

August 25, 1978.

Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Karen K. Brown, Gustavo L. Acevedo, Asst. Federal Public Defenders, Houston, Tex. for defendant-appellant.

J. A. Canales, U.S. Atty., John M. Potter, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Robert A. Berg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., James R. Gough, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before THORNBERRY, GEE and FAY, Circuit Judges.



Appellant, sentenced on October 28, 1977, filed his Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence on March 7, 1978 — 130 days after sentence was imposed. That rule permits a sentencing judge to reconsider a sentence "within 120 days after the sentence is imposed . . .." Whatever latitude may exist for consideration by the judge after this period of motions filed within it, the judge is without jurisdiction to consider motions not filed within it. United States v. Flores, 507 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1975).

Appellant's motion was for this reason correctly denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kemner

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 25, 1978
578 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

United States v. Kemner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CHARLES RICHARD KEMNER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Aug 25, 1978

Citations

578 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mariano

The jurisdictional issue presented is whether the sentencing court may entertain a Rule 35 motion made more…

United States v. Cotton

Beyond this substantive judicial gloss on rule 35, it is generally held that the 120-day time limitation is…