From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Keese

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 15, 2015
2:12-cr-00080-TLN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2015)

Opinion

          CHRISTOPHER BOOTH, (PHV), ATTORNEY AT LAW, New York, NY, Attorney for Defendant, HERMAN KEESE.

          HEIKO COPPOLA, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.

          MICHAEL CHASTAINE, Attorney for Defendant, DEBORAH BARNES.

          CLEMENTE JIMENEZ, Attorney for Defendant, JAMES BRADLEY.

          DAVID FISCHER, Attorney for Defendant, BRETT TOWNSEND.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Heiko Coppola, Counsel for Plaintiff, Christopher Booth counsel for defendant HERMAN KEESE, Michael Chastaine, counsel for DEBORAH BARNES, Clemente Jimenez, counsel for defendant JAMES BRADLEY and David Fischer, counsel for defendant BRETT TOWNSEND, that the status conference scheduled for September 17, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on October 1, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. for further status conference. Discovery in this case is voluminous, consisting of hundreds of pages of discovery and several dozen hours of audio recordings. Counsels require additional time to review discovery and confer with their respective clients.

         IT IS FURTHER STIPULTATED that the time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 316(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

          ORDER

         IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for September 17, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to October 1, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference. The Court finds that the time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.


Summaries of

United States v. Keese

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 15, 2015
2:12-cr-00080-TLN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Keese

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HERMAN KEESE, DEBORAH BARNES…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 15, 2015

Citations

2:12-cr-00080-TLN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2015)