From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 2, 1993
996 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1993)

Opinion

Nos. 91-1200, 91-1201.

July 2, 1993.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court 986 F.2d 434 is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 2, 1993
996 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1993)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROY LEE JOHNSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jul 2, 1993

Citations

996 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

State v. Richardson

There is federal authority with similar facts to these which would suggest a different result here. See…