From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2015
2:12-CR-00250-TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MATTHEW MORRIS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.

          KELLY BABINEAU, Attorney for Defendant, Kristin Caldwell.

          WILLIAM DUBOIS, Attorney for Defendant, WILLIAM L. BROWN.

          KYLE KNAPP, Attorney for Defendant, XAVIER JOHNSON.

          KYLE R. KNAPP, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant, XAVIER JOHNSON.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Matthew Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff, together with Kelly Babineau, attorney for defendant Kristin Caldwell; William Dubois, attorney for defendant William L. Brown and Kyle Knapp, attorney for defendant Xavier Johnson that the previously-scheduled status conference, currently set for September 3, 2015, be vacated and that the matter be set for status conference on September 24, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

         Counsel have conferred and this continuance is requested to allow defense counsel additional time to finalize review of the discovery, met again with our clients, investigate possible defenses and to continue exploring the facts of the case. In addition, there are anticipated plea agreements which will have to be triaged with our respective clients. Finally, I believe at least one counsel will be in trial this week.

         IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B) (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare) from the date of the parties' stipulation, September 1, 2015, up to and including September 24, 2015.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         The Stipulation of the parties is hereby accepted and the requested continuance is GRANTED. This matter shall be dropped from this court's September 3, 2015 criminal calendar and re-calendared for status conference on September 24, 2015, at 9:30 a.m..

         Based on the representations of the parties the court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded from the time of the filing of this stipulation on September 1, 2015, through and including September 24, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2015
2:12-CR-00250-TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. XAVIER JOHNSON, KRISTIN M…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2015

Citations

2:12-CR-00250-TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2015)