Opinion
4:21-cr-00327 KGB
08-07-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. CHRISTOPHER MAURICE JACKSON DEFENDANT
ORDER
Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge.
Pending is the defendant Christopher Jackson's motion in limine (Dkt. No. 34). The government responded to the motion (Dkt. No. 41). At this time, based on the record currently before it, the Court denies the motion in limine (Dkt. No. 34). The Court determines that, based on the record currently before it, the anticipated evidence is relevant under Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 402 and not excludable under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. See United States v. Obi, 25 F.4th 574 (8th Cir. 2022); see also United States v. Woodley, 727 Fed.Appx. 136 (6th Cir. 2018); United States v. Dougherty, 321 Fed.Appx. 762 (10th Cir. 2009). Either party may renew this motion with the Court during trial, if appropriate, as the record evidence before the Court changes.
It is so ordered.