From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jacksen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
No. CR 13-00006-1 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 13-00006-1 WHA

03-07-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERRY JACKSEN, Defendant.


ORDER RE DEFENDANT

TERRY JACKSEN'S REQUEST

FOR DISCOVERY

On February 28, defendant Terry Jacksen filed a motion to suppress evidence and request to participate in the hearing scheduled for March 8. That hearing was set by order dated February 19 based on Eric Mendonca's earlier filed motion to suppress and request for a Franks hearing. Counsel for Jacksen, Attorney Deborah Levine has also filed a request for discovery.

Documents that have been produced by the government or received by counsel for Mendonca in connection with the Franks hearing, whether subpoenaed pursuant to motion by counsel for Mendonca or otherwise produced by the government, shall be provided to Attorney Levine ON OR BEFORE MARCH 8, 2013. As the March 8 hearing was ordered well in advance of Attorney Levine's request for discovery and motion to suppress, no continuances will be granted by reason of any discovery issues related to Attorney Levine's request or this order authorizing production. The extent of Attorney Levine's participation in the hearing will be determined at the hearing on March 8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Jacksen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
No. CR 13-00006-1 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Jacksen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERRY JACKSEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

No. CR 13-00006-1 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)