From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Estrada

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 9, 2013
729 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 11–50417.

2013-09-9

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Salvador HERNANDEZ–ESTRADA, Defendant–Appellant.

Victor Pablo White, Adams and Reese LLP, Bruce R. Castetter, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Michele Akemi McKenzie, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.


Victor Pablo White, Adams and Reese LLP, Bruce R. Castetter, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Michele Akemi McKenzie, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.
D.C. No. 3:10–cr–00558–BTM–1.

ORDER


KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Estrada

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 9, 2013
729 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Estrada

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Salvador…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Sep 9, 2013

Citations

729 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hernandez-Estrada

Chief Judge Kozinski, joined by Judge Watford, filed a concurring opinion urging us to reconsider en banc our…