From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Henry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 23, 2020
Case No. 0:19-cr-303-SRN-KMM-1 (D. Minn. Jan. 23, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 0:19-cr-303-SRN-KMM-1

01-23-2020

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Patrick Lloyd Henry Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on motions for discovery and disclosure filed by the government and Defendant Patrick Lloyd Henry. The Court held a hearing on the Motions on January 13, 2020. Based on the motions that were filed, the written responses, and the arguments presented at the hearing, the Court enters the following Order.

The Court will separately issue a report and recommendation on Mr. Henry's Motion to Suppress Statements and Motion to Suppress Evidence. (ECF Nos. 22, 23.) --------

1. Government's Motion for Discovery (ECF 18)

The government's motion for discovery of information pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is GRANTED. The defendant shall provide discovery and disclosures as required by the Fed. R. Crim. P. 16.

2. Mr. Henry's Motion for Discovery (ECF No. 21)

Mr. Henry's motion for discovery and inspection is GRANTED to the extent it seeks discovery and disclosure consistent with Fed. R. Crim. P. 16. The government shall continue to comply with its discovery and disclosure obligations.

3. Mr. Henry's Motion for Disclosure of Favorable Evidence (ECF No. 24)

Mr. Henry's motion for disclosure of favorable evidence is GRANTED. The government is obligated to disclose evidence favorable to Mr. Barnes as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and their progeny. These cases place an ongoing obligation on counsel for the government to disclose exculpatory evidence and impeachment material to Mr. Henry.

4. Mr. Henry's Motion for Disclosure of 404(b) Evidence (ECF No. 25)

Mr. Henry's motion for disclosure of Rule 404(b) evidence is GRANTED. The government shall disclose any evidence it intends to offer at trial pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) at least two weeks before trial.

5. Mr. Henry's Motion for Disclosure of Jenks Act Material (ECF No. 26)

Mr. Henry's motion for early disclosure of Jencks Act material is DENIED. The Jencks Act provides that the government "need not produce Jencks statements prior to a witness' testimony on direct examination." United States v. Douglas, 964 F.2d 738, 741 & n.2 (8th Cir. 1992) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3500(b) and discussing the government's option to make earlier voluntary disclosure, such as through an "open file policy"). However, the government is strongly encouraged to disclose any Jencks Act material as early as possible. To the extent any Jencks Act material has not yet been shared, the government has agreed to provide it to the defense no later than three working days before trial. Date: January 23, 2020

s/Katherine Menendez

Katherine Menendez

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Henry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 23, 2020
Case No. 0:19-cr-303-SRN-KMM-1 (D. Minn. Jan. 23, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Patrick Lloyd Henry Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jan 23, 2020

Citations

Case No. 0:19-cr-303-SRN-KMM-1 (D. Minn. Jan. 23, 2020)