From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Han

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 11, 2016
628 F. App'x 457 (8th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-2616

01-11-2016

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dong Pyou Han Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines [Unpublished] Before SMITH, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Dong Pyou Han directly appeals the 57-month sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to making false statements. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable. We conclude that the within-Guidelines sentence was not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (under substantive review, district court abuses its discretion if it fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing factors); United States v. Cook, 698 F.3d 667, 670 (8th Cir. 2012) (treating within-Guidelines sentence as presumptively reasonable on appeal). We have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. --------

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.


Summaries of

United States v. Han

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 11, 2016
628 F. App'x 457 (8th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Han

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dong Pyou Han Defendant …

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

628 F. App'x 457 (8th Cir. 2016)