From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company

United States District Court, D. Delaware
Jan 10, 1941
36 F. Supp. 486 (D. Del. 1941)

Opinion

Civil Action 183.

January 10, 1941. On motion to dismiss.

Thurman Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Mac Asbill and W.B. Watson Snyder, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., H. Douglas Weaver, Sp. Atty., of Washington, D.C., and Stewart Lynch, U.S. Atty., of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Dan Moody, of Austin, Tex., James J. Cosgrove, of Ponca City, Okla., and Clarence A. Southerland (of Southerland, Berl, Potter Leahy), of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

Before BIGGS, CLARK, and JONES, Circuit Judges.


The questions raised by the motion to dismiss the petition in the case at bar are disposed of by our opinion filed this day in the case of United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Phillips Petroleum Company and Phillips Pipe Line Company, Defendants, 36 F. Supp. 480.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company

United States District Court, D. Delaware
Jan 10, 1941
36 F. Supp. 486 (D. Del. 1941)
Case details for

United States v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Delaware

Date published: Jan 10, 1941

Citations

36 F. Supp. 486 (D. Del. 1941)