From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Grady

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 21, 2015
13-cr-137 TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, NOA E. OREN, Assistant Federal Defender, Designated Counsel for Service, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant, CHRISTOPHER GRADY.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, MATTHEW MORRIS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Benjamin Wagner, U.S. Attorney, through Matthew Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender, Noa E. Oren, attorney for Christopher Grady, that the status conference scheduled for September 24, 2015 be vacated and continued to October 8, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

         The reasons for the continuance are to review additional discovery with client and to continuing investigating the facts of the case.

         Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including October 8, 2015; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

         Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

          ORDER

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including October 8, 2015, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the September 24, 2015 status conference shall be continued until October 8, 2015, at 9:30 a.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Grady

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 21, 2015
13-cr-137 TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Grady

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER GRADY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 21, 2015

Citations

13-cr-137 TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2015)