From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gamboa-Cano

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 31, 1975
510 F.2d 598 (5th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-2652.

March 31, 1975.

Victor R. Arditti, El Paso, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

William S. Sessions, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ronald Ederer, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.


We have considered the several assignments of error by appellant in this case relating to the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the jury's verdict of guilty, to the asserted involuntariness of the defendant's confession, to the conduct of the judge during the trial as having been prejudicial to the defendant, and to the alleged failure of the trial judge to comply with the principle of Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974), relative to the necessity of an explicit finding that defendant would not benefit from sentencing under the Youth Corrections Act.

After a careful review of the record, we find the assignments of error to be without merit. We also hold that since the defendant herein is over the age of 22, a young adult offender, the sentencing judge was not required to make explicit findings that the defendant would not benefit from the Youth Corrections Act (18 U.S.C. § 4209).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Gamboa-Cano

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 31, 1975
510 F.2d 598 (5th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

United States v. Gamboa-Cano

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ALVARO GAMBOA-CANO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 31, 1975

Citations

510 F.2d 598 (5th Cir. 1975)

Citing Cases

United States v. Brown

Additionally, appellant Rover is a young adult offender, over the age of 22, and the sentencing judge is not…

Sanchez v. United States

Without supporting evidence of any kind he now asserts there was. This is not sufficient. Matthews v. U.S.,…