From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Furman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 11, 2015
Criminal No. 14-323 (DSD/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 11, 2015)

Opinion

Criminal No. 14-323 (DSD/LIB)

03-11-2015

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Rex Lee Furman, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure, [Docket No. 21], is DENIED.

2. Defendant Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions, and Answers, [Docket No. 22], is DENIED. Dated: March 11, 2015

s/David S. Doty

DAVID S. DOTY, Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Furman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 11, 2015
Criminal No. 14-323 (DSD/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 11, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Furman

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Rex Lee Furman, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Mar 11, 2015

Citations

Criminal No. 14-323 (DSD/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 11, 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Order Requiring Apple, Inc.

Cf. United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000); United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605 (1984); Fisher v. United…