From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dreyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Mar 25, 2015
782 F.3d 416 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 13–30077.

03-25-2015

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Michael Allan DREYER, Defendant–Appellant.

Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Justin Arnold, Assistant U.S., Marci Lynette Ellsworth, Assistant U.S., J. Tate London, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Erik B. Levin, Law Office of Erik Levin, Berkeley, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.


Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Justin Arnold, Assistant U.S., Marci Lynette Ellsworth, Assistant U.S., J. Tate London, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff–Appellee.

Erik B. Levin, Law Office of Erik Levin, Berkeley, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

United States v. Dreyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Mar 25, 2015
782 F.3d 416 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Dreyer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Michael Allan DREYER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Mar 25, 2015

Citations

782 F.3d 416 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Dreyer

A majority of the active judges of our court voted to rehear this case en banc to reconsider the important…

Gentles v. United States

For his argument for his first claim, Gentles complains that his "trial counsel was ineffective by failing to…