Opinion
No. 16163.
Argued January 6, 1967.
Decided January 17, 1967. Rehearing Denied March 3, 1967.
Emmett J. Conte, Jr., Wilmington, Del., for appellant.
Alfred J. Lindh, Sp. Asst. in Dept. of Justice, Wilmington, Del. (Alexander Greenfeld, U.S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, SMITH and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant was convicted of violations of the Federal Wagering Laws, 26 U.S.C. § 7201 and 7203.
We find no error under the trial circumstances in the Court's denial of appellant's requests for certain material, purportedly under the authority of the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, in one instance for the Court's inspection and in a second instance to be furnished defendant for his inspection and use on cross-examination. Also under the trial circumstances we find no substantial error in the admission of the identification testimony, the only remaining point advanced on this appeal.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.