From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dhavamani

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
May 20, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:19-00159 (S.D.W. Va. May. 20, 2020)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:19-00159

05-20-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARUN DHAVAMANI


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the court is W. Michael Frazier's motion to withdraw as the defendant's counsel. (ECF No. 104.) Mr. Frazier represented the defendant in a criminal case which was tried before this court on November 19-20, 2019. Defendant was found guilty by a jury verdict, and is awaiting sentencing by this court, scheduled for 10:30 a.m. on June 2, 2020. (ECF No. 97.) On May 15, 2020, Mr. Frazier filed a motion seeking leave to withdraw due to deteriorating relations with defendant. (ECF No. 104.) Mr. Frazier states in his motion that defendant "has become increasingly less cooperative with counsel, and has now taken to threatening counsel with lawsuits and/or bar complaints." (Id.) Mr. Frazier states that he notified in writing defendant and defendant's family of his intention to withdraw. (Id.) He had not received any response from defendant or his family by the time of his filing. (Id.) He also asks the court to appoint counsel for defendant for the sentencing hearing. (Id.)

Withdrawal of representation in a criminal action is governed by Local Rule 44.4, which states in part that "[a] motion to withdraw shall be accompanied by a notice of appearance of substitute counsel. In the absence of the appearance of substitute counsel, a motion to withdraw shall set forth sufficient information to enable the court to rule." L.R. Cr. P. 44.4. There has not yet been any notice of appearance of substitute counsel.

As noted above, Mr. Frazier requests that the court appoint counsel for defendant. "To qualify for court-appointed counsel under the CJA [Criminal Justice Act], a 'defendant bears the burden of proving that he lacks the [financial] means to retain counsel.'" United States v. Gutierrez-Cruz, 680 F. App'x 203, 205 (4th Cir. 2017) (quoting United States v. Ductan, 800 F.3d 642, 652 n.5 (4th Cir. 2015)).

The court hereby ORDERS a hearing to be held at 10:00 a.m. on June 2, 2020, in Bluefield, at which time the court will hear from Mr. Frazier and defendant on the motion to withdraw. The court will hear from defendant whether he concurs with Mr. Frazier's motion and he also desires new representation, and if defendant does, whether defendant wishes to retain counsel himself or have the court appoint counsel for him. Then, if defendant wishes to have the court appoint counsel on his behalf, the court will determine whether defendant qualifies for court-appointed counsel.

Defendant and all counsel should be prepared for the sentencing hearing to be held as scheduled at 10:30 a.m. on June 2, 2020, should the court deny Mr. Frazier's motion to withdraw.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record, and to defendant.

It is SO ORDERED this 20th day of May, 2020.

ENTER:

/s/_________

David A. Faber

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Dhavamani

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
May 20, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:19-00159 (S.D.W. Va. May. 20, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Dhavamani

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARUN DHAVAMANI

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD

Date published: May 20, 2020

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:19-00159 (S.D.W. Va. May. 20, 2020)