From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. De Smet

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 11, 1972
456 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-2811.

April 11, 1972.

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes Bassoni, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Stanley A. Weigel, Judge.

Before CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.


The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the "call" process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.

However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the "calling."


Summaries of

United States v. De Smet

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 11, 1972
456 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. De Smet

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, v. JOEL MARK DE SMET…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 1972

Citations

456 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Strayhorn

See United States v. Hall, 449 F.2d 1206, 1208 (5th Cir. 1971). Our disposition of this issue makes it…