Opinion
Criminal Action No. 11-99 (JLL)
07-30-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. ANDREW COX, Defendant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court by way of Defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty [Docket Entry No. 95]. For the reasons stated in the Court's corresponding Opinion dated July 30, 2012,
IT IS on this 30th day of July, 2012,
ORDERED that Defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty [Docket Entry No. 95] is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the following motions are all DENIED AS MOOT: Defendant's motion to dismiss the Superseding Complaint and Indictment [Docket Entry No. 88]; Defendant's motion to produce grand jury materials [Docket Entry No. 92]; Defendant's motion for discovery [Docket Entry No. 78]; Defendant's motion to declare his innocence as to "the six dated counts on which [he] previously pled guilty" and for the return of property seized by pretrial services while on bail [Docket Entry No. 108]; Defendant's motion to disclose the reason for sealing [Docket Entry No. 90]; and Defendant's motion for pretrial services to produce the search warrant for its March 23, 2011 search and seizure [Docket Entry Nos. 87, 113]; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendant's sentencing is hereby set for Wednesday, August 8, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. before the Undersigned.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________
Jose L. Linares
United States District Judge