From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Conshafter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Aug 7, 2012
Case No. 4:12cr22 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 4:12cr22

08-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM BRAD CONSHAFTER (1)


(Judge Crone)


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 25, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Dkt. #14) be denied.

The Court, having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Defendant (Dkt. #22), is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is accordingly

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Dkt. #14) is DENIED.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of August, 2012.

______________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Conshafter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Aug 7, 2012
Case No. 4:12cr22 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Conshafter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM BRAD CONSHAFTER (1)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

Case No. 4:12cr22 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Murray

Although an overnight guest at another's residence may have a legitimate expectation of privacy at that…