From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.

U.S.
Feb 27, 1996
516 U.S. 415 (1996)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-1893.

Argued December 6, 1995 Decided February 27, 1996

Together with No. 94-1900, National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Corp. et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

42 f.3d 181, vacated and remanded.

Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs for petitioners in No. 94-1893 were Solicitor General Days, Acting Assistant Attorney General Phillips, Paul R. Q. Wolfson, Douglas N. Letter, Mark B. Stern, Bruce G. Forrest, William E. Kennard, and Christopher J. Wright. H. Bartow Farr III, Richard G. Taranto, Daniel L. Brenner, Neal M. Goldberg, and David L. Nicoll filed briefs for petitioner in No. 94-1900.

Laurence H. Tribe argued the cause for respondents in both cases. With him on the brief were Jonathan S. Massey, Peter J. Rubin, Mark L. Evans, Kenneth W. Starr, Paul T. Cappuccio, James R. Young, John Thorne, and Michael E. Glover.

Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the California Cable Television Association by Bruce D. Sokler and Frank W. Lloyd III; and for the Consumer Federation of America et al. by Gigi B. Sohn and Andrew Jay Schwartzman.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. by Burt Neuborne and Steven R. Shapiro; for BellSouth Corp. by Walter H. Alford, John F. Beasley, William Barfield, and Roger M. Flynt, Jr.; for East Ascension Telephone Co. by Richard A. Epstein; for GTE Corp. by M. Edward Whelan III, John F. Raposa, and Richard A. Cordray; for Mets Fans United/Virginia Consumers for Cable Choice et al. by Samuel A. Simon; for the United States Telephone Association et al. by Michael W. McConnell and Kenneth S. Geller; and for U S Page 416 West, Inc., by Lloyd N. Cutler, Louis R. Cohen, William T. Lake, and Stuart S. Gunckel.



The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for consideration of the question whether they are moot.


Summaries of

United States v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.

U.S.
Feb 27, 1996
516 U.S. 415 (1996)
Case details for

United States v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES ET AL. v . CHESAPEAKE POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 27, 1996

Citations

516 U.S. 415 (1996)

Citing Cases

Satellite Broadcasting Communications v. F.C.C.

This Court notes that numerous courts have questioned and/or declined to extend the Red Lion rationale. See,…

Satellite Broadcasting Comm. Ass'n v. F.C.C

"First, we must examine the plain terms of the regulation to see whether, on its face, the regulation confers…