Opinion
Case No: 1:07CR00061-003 USM No: 08611-028
02-13-2012
Date of Original Judgment: 05/02/2008
Date of Previous Amended Judgment: ______
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)
None
Defendant's Attorney
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of [√] the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
[√] DENIED. [] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence ofimprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of ___ months is reduced to ___.
(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated ______shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Unless otherwise indicated, the effective date of this order shall be ten (10) days after order date.
(if different from order date)
____________
LARRY J. McKINNEY, JUDGE
United Stales District Court
Southern District of Indiana