From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carrion

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 9, 1973
475 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 73-1171.

March 9, 1973.

Victor Sherman, Beverly Hills, Cal., pro se.

Jan Lawrence Handzlik, Asst. U.S. Atty., for William D. Keller, U.S. Atty.

Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.

The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.


ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY


For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Victor Sherman, counsel for appellant, is assessed a penalty of Two Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The sum is to be paid into the registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California within 14 days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

United States v. Carrion

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 9, 1973
475 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

United States v. Carrion

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ANTHONY NICHOLAS CARRION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 9, 1973

Citations

475 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Esser v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc.

Fred Weber, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co., supra. While the majority of cases involving complaints of attorney…