From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Baker

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 11, 1946
155 F.2d 16 (3d Cir. 1946)

Opinion

No. 8982.

Argued December 3, 1945.

Decided April 11, 1946.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Albert L. Watson, Judge.

Henry Baker was convicted of violating the Anti-KickBack Act, and he appeals.

Reversed and indictment dismissed.

Robert J. Fitzsimmons, of New York City, for appellant.

Leo Meltzer, of Washington, D.C. (A.W.W. Woodcock, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Frederick V. Follmer, U.S. Atty., of Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, GOODRICH, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.


The appellant, a shop steward of a closed union shop, was convicted on a number of counts of an indictment charging him with violations of the provisions of Section 1 of the Act of June 13, 1934, the Anti-KickBack Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 276b. Sums were collected by the appellant or under the appellant's direction from workmen engaged in building the supply depot of the United States Navy at Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, for initiation fees into the union and for "work permits." The sums collected by the appellant or collected pursuant to his direction were properly accounted for to the union. The instant case is ruled by the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Carbone, 66 S.Ct. 734. Consequently the judgment of conviction must be reversed and the indictment dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Baker

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 11, 1946
155 F.2d 16 (3d Cir. 1946)
Case details for

United States v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. BAKER

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 1946

Citations

155 F.2d 16 (3d Cir. 1946)

Citing Cases

Kendrick v. Greiner

For a habeas petitioner to prevail on a claim that an evidentiary error amounted to a deprivation of due…