From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Atsemet

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 15, 2024
CR 24-082 KKE (W.D. Wash. Jul. 15, 2024)

Opinion

CR 24-082 KKE

07-15-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SALINA ROSE ATSEMET, Defendant.


ORDER APPOINTING RUSSELL M. AOKI AS COORDINATING DISCOVERY ATTORNEY

KYMBERLY K. EVANSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Counsel for Defendant Salina Rose Atsemet has moved for appointment of Russell M. Aoki of Aoki Law PLLC as Coordinating Discovery Attorney. Dkt. No. 24. The Government does not oppose the motion. Id. at 1.

Because discovery in this matter is expected to be voluminous (Dkt. No. 24 at 2), and because Aoki's experience as a Coordinating Discovery Attorney in more than 140 federal cases in 46 jurisdictions (id. at 3), including matters related to this one (id. at 2), will help defense counsel avoid duplicative work (id. at 3), the Court finds good cause to GRANT the motion to appoint. Dkt. No. 24. It is hereby ORDERED that Russell M. Aoki of Aoki Law PLLC is appointed as Coordinating Discovery Attorney for court-appointed defense counsel.

The Coordinating Discovery Attorney shall oversee any discovery issues common to the court-appointed defendants. His responsibilities will include:

• Managing and, unless otherwise agreed upon with the Government, distributing discovery produced by the Government and relevant third-party information common to defendants;
• Assessing the amount and type of case data to determine what types of technology should be evaluated and used so duplicative costs are avoided and the most efficient and cost-effective methods are identified;
• Acting as a liaison with federal prosecutors to ensure the timely and effective exchange of discovery;
• Identifying, evaluating, and engaging third-party vendors and other litigation support services;
• Assessing the needs of individual parties and identifying any additional vendor support that may be required-including copying, scanning, forensic imaging, data processing, data hosting, trial presentation, and other technology depending on the nature of the case;
• Identifying any additional human resources that the individual parties may need for the organization and substantive review of information; and
• Providing training and support services to the defense teams as a group and individually.

When executing these responsibilities, the Coordinating Discovery Attorney shall assess the most effective and cost-efficient manner to organize the discovery with input from defense counsel.

The Coordinating Discovery Attorney's duties do not include providing representation services and will not be establishing an attorney-client relationship with any defendant. Discovery intended for the counsel of a specific defendant and not to be shared with the other defense counsel shall be produced by the Government directly to the defense counsel for that defendant. Discovery issues specific to one defendant shall be addressed by defense counsel directly with the Government and not through the Coordinating Discovery Attorney.

For any discovery common to all defendants already produced by the Government before this Order, the Government shall provide a copy to the Coordinating Discovery Attorney within 14 days. Any additional discovery not already produced shall be provided directly to the Coordinating Discovery Attorney, who shall duplicate and distribute the discovery to defense counsel unless the Government elects to produce discovery directly to defense counsel with a simultaneous copy to the Coordinating Discovery Attorney. The Government shall work with the Coordinating Discovery Attorney to provide discovery in a timely manner.

The Coordinating Discovery Attorney shall petition this Court, ex parte, for funds for outside services and shall monitor all vendor invoices for these services, including confirming the work previously agreed to be performed. However, the Coordinating Discovery Attorney's time and the time spent by his staff will be paid by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Defender Services Office. All petitions for outside services shall include a basis for the requested funds and a determination that the cost of the service is reasonable.

The Coordinating Discovery Attorney shall also provide this Court with monthly ex parte status reports depicting the status of work and whether that work remains within the budget of any funds authorized by the Court, with the copy provided to defense counsel.


Summaries of

United States v. Atsemet

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 15, 2024
CR 24-082 KKE (W.D. Wash. Jul. 15, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Atsemet

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SALINA ROSE ATSEMET, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 15, 2024

Citations

CR 24-082 KKE (W.D. Wash. Jul. 15, 2024)