From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Acosta

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 4, 1975
509 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 73-4016.

March 7, 1975. Rehearing Denied April 4, 1975.

Raymond C. Caballero, El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

William S. Sessions, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Edward Marquez, Ronald F. Ederer, Asst. U.S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Ernest Guinn, Judge.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.


The Court adopts that part of the dissenting opinion of the panel dealing with "The Sentencing Procedure" and vacates the sentence and remands the case for further sentencing, 501 F.2d 1330.

The Court, en banc, having considered the opinion and the judgment of the panel dealing with the admissibility of the evidence seized from Acosta's premises, is equally divided on this issue. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed by an evenly divided Court.


Summaries of

United States v. Acosta

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 4, 1975
509 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

United States v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ALFONSO ACOSTA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 1975

Citations

509 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1975)

Citing Cases

United States v. Garcia

This price was too high. We, therefore, cannot permit the sentences to stand.Accord, United States v. Acosta,…

State v. Nooner

Nooner contends that the judge's language, "Well, I was seriously considering a suspended sentence, but I…