From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Trust Company v. Simon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 17, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (DiBlasi, J.).


Ordered that the order dated October 30, 1995, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated December 11, 1995, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs are awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in setting aside the foreclosure sale based on the Referee's misunderstanding as to his authority to accept uncertified funds as a down payment (see, Guardian Loan Co. v. Early, 45 N.Y.2d 515; Glenville 110 Corp. v. Tortora, 137 A.D.2d 654; Ulster Sav. Bank v. Bash, 114 A.D.2d 500).

The appellant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

United States Trust Company v. Simon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

United States Trust Company v. Simon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY, Respondent, v. MAYER SIMON et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

JP Morgan Chase, N.A. v. Rajendran

Here, in support of his motion, the defendant-mortgagor, Michael S. Rajendran, demonstrated that the Referee…

JP Morgan Chase, N.A. v. Rajendran

Here, in support of his motion, the defendant-mortgagor, Michael S. Rajendran, demonstrated that the Referee…