From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Trust Company of New York v. Hoyt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1918
119 N.E. 1083 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued March 18, 1918

Decided April 2, 1918

Howard Mansfield and Lucius H. Beers for Isabel H. Bangs, appellant.

William W. Scrugham and Anson Baldwin for Cornelia B. Hoyt et al., appellants.

William A.W. Stewart and Charles W. McKelvey for plaintiff, respondent.

Marshall B. Clarke and Samuel T. Carter, Jr., for Dorothy Hoyt, defendant, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and CRANE, JJ. Not sitting: HISCOCK, Ch. J., and McLAUGHLIN, J.


Summaries of

United States Trust Company of New York v. Hoyt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1918
119 N.E. 1083 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

United States Trust Company of New York v. Hoyt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . DOROTHY HOYT et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 2, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1083 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1083

Citing Cases

Hopkins v. Hopkins

But I fail to find any specific provision in the statute extending the right of the adopted child to inherit…

Matter of Cohn

Within the meaning of the will and the intent of the testator, he is the sole "heir" of the granddaughter of…