From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moreton

United States District Court, W. D. New York
Apr 13, 1960
25 F.R.D. 262 (W.D.N.Y. 1960)

Opinion

         Prosecution for various narcotics violations in which various of defendants moved for severance of offenses and defendants. The District Court, Henderson, J., held that under indictment charging aggregate of 17 defendants with various narcotics violations containing 2,553 separate counts, 11 of these being allegations of conspiracy and the remainder being allegations of substantive violations, where not all of the defendants charged with substantive violations were included in the conspiracy counts and not all of the conspiracies encompass the same persons in each case, single trial would be prejudicial to defendants charged and render it difficult for court to adequately charge jury as to applicable law with respect to each defendant and hence court would grant severance.

         Ordered accordingly.

          Neil R. Farmelo, U.S. Atty., Buffalo, N.Y. (John P. MacArthur and John H. Stenger, Buffalo, N.Y., of counsel), for U. S.

         John A. Russelli, Albion, N.Y., for Joseph Abbinanti.

         Peter L. Parrino, Buffalo, N.Y., for Gino Albini.

         Robert P. Freedman, Buffalo, N.Y., for Salvatore Battaglia.

         Anthony J. Colucci, Jr., Buffalo, N.Y., for Clyde Buster.

         Thomas V. Considine, Buffalo, N.Y., for Rafus Buster.

         Harold J. Boreanaz, Buffalo, N.Y., for George DeMoninicis.

         William B. Mahoney, Buffalo, N.Y., for Rose Marie DeJohn.

         Salten Rodenberg, Buffalo, N.Y., for John Domiano.

         Charles F. Crimi, Buffalo, N.Y., for John Gateff.

         Herald P. Fahringer, Jr., Buffalo, N.Y., for Salvatore Gelia.

         Herald P. Fahringer, Jr., Buffalo, N.Y., for Thomas Gelia.

         Salten Rodenberg, Buffalo, N.Y., for Anthony Grillo.

         Vincent E. Doyle, Jr., Buffalo, N.Y., for Moses Kelly.

         J. Edmund DeCastro, Jr., Buffalo, N.Y., for Albert Moreton.

         William B. Mahoney, Buffalo, N.Y., for Joseph A. Moses.

         William B. Mahoney, Buffalo, N.Y., for Rose V. Moses.

         William D. O'Neill, Buffalo, N.Y., for Carmello Parisi.


          HENDERSON, District Judge.

         Various defendants herein have moved against the indictment, alleging misjoinder under Rule 8(b) and/or prejudicial joinder under Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., and requesting the severance of offenses and defendants. The indictment charges an aggregate of seventeen defendants with various narcotics violations. There are 2,553 separate counts in all, 11 of these being allegations of conspiracy against the defendants named therein and the remainder being allegations of substantive violations. Not all of the defendants charged with substantive violations are included in conspiracy counts, nor do all of the conspiracies encompass the same persons in each case.

         The court, having considered these motions, the indictment, and all of the proceedings herein, has concluded that a single trial of all defendants under this multi-count indictment, as now constituted, would be prejudicial to the defendants charged. The complex involvement of the various defendants and the multiplicity of charges contained in the indictment would render it difficult, if not impossible, for the court to adequately charge a jury as to the applicable law with respect to each defendant and for the jury to apply that law intelligently in reaching verdicts on the many charges involved.

          Accordingly, on the court's own motion, acting under Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the indictment herein is severed at this time as to counts 8 and 11 thereof. Trial will proceed on April 25, 1960, the date previously set for trial of all defendants named in the indictment, restricted, however, to these two counts (counts 8 and 11) and the three defendants named therein, Albert Moreton, Joseph A. Moses, and Rose V. Moses.

         Except to the extent herein granted, the motions previously made under Rules 8(b) and/or 14 on behalf of various of the defendants herein are not ruled upon, but are held generally. Trial dates and further severance of the offenses and/or defendants other than as hereinbefore provided for will await further order of this court.


Summaries of

United States v. Moreton

United States District Court, W. D. New York
Apr 13, 1960
25 F.R.D. 262 (W.D.N.Y. 1960)
Case details for

United States v. Moreton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. Albert MORETON et al.

Court:United States District Court, W. D. New York

Date published: Apr 13, 1960

Citations

25 F.R.D. 262 (W.D.N.Y. 1960)

Citing Cases

United States v. DeLeon

The unique complexity of this multi-count Second Superseding Indictment, as it now stands, "would render it…

U.S. v. Andrews

hs); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289, 1320 (11th Cir. 1982) (12-defendant, 70-count trial that lasted…