From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Farm Wkrs v. Ariz. Agric. Emp. Relations

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1984
733 F.2d 78 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 80-5777.

May 8, 1984.

Ellen J. Eggers, Keene, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Neil Vincent Wake, Beus, Gilbert, Wake Morrill, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Before FERGUSON, NELSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The court sitting en banc has affirmed the judgment of the district court that the Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Act is facially constitutional, 727 F.2d 1475.

The court did not determine whether the Act is constitutional as applied in any specific instance.

The case is remanded to the district court with directions to permit the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to raise any issues not determined by the March 14, 1984 decision of the court sitting en banc.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.


Summaries of

United Farm Wkrs v. Ariz. Agric. Emp. Relations

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1984
733 F.2d 78 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

United Farm Wkrs v. Ariz. Agric. Emp. Relations

Case Details

Full title:UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 8, 1984

Citations

733 F.2d 78 (9th Cir. 1984)