From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Cannery Maintenance v. Local 80-A

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 18, 1954
108 A.2d 425 (N.J. 1954)

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1954 —

Decided October 18, 1954.

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court.

Mr. Abraham Greenberg argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Alfred R. Pierce, attorney for the respondents.


Defendants filed a notice of appeal to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court from two interlocutory orders of the Law Division, one denying a motion for summary judgment and the other requiring one of the defendants and certain witnesses to answer questions propounded to them on the taking of depositions.

The orders sought to be appealed from do not come within any of the classes enumerated in R.R. 2:2-3(a) in which appeals may be taken as of right from interlocutory judgments. The defendants have not obtained leave to appeal as required by subsection (b) of that rule.

The appeal therefore is dismissed.

For dismissal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

United Cannery Maintenance v. Local 80-A

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 18, 1954
108 A.2d 425 (N.J. 1954)
Case details for

United Cannery Maintenance v. Local 80-A

Case Details

Full title:UNITED CANNERY MAINTENANCE, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. LOCAL…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 18, 1954

Citations

108 A.2d 425 (N.J. 1954)
108 A.2d 425

Citing Cases

State in Interest of R.L

Many critical determinations having immediate effect are made by interlocutory orders; yet our cases…

Rendon v. Kassimis

Orders denying motions for summary judgment are intrinsically interlocutory, contemplating plenary rather…