From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Pacific R.R. Co. v. Meeks

Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Mar 27, 2012
NO. 14-11-01034-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 14-11-01034-CV

03-27-2012

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant v. WALLACE L. MEEKS, JAMES M. GRAHAM, JR. AND TOMMY C. THOMPSON, Appellees


Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2012.

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-33406


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 28, 2011. The clerk's record was filed December 16, 2011. The reporter's record was filed December 15, 2011. No brief was filed.

On February 2, 2012, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant submitted a brief on or before March 2, 2012, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellant filed no response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Brown, and Boyce.


Summaries of

Union Pacific R.R. Co. v. Meeks

Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Mar 27, 2012
NO. 14-11-01034-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Union Pacific R.R. Co. v. Meeks

Case Details

Full title:UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant v. WALLACE L. MEEKS, JAMES M…

Court:Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 27, 2012

Citations

NO. 14-11-01034-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Texas Company v. Snow

Hence the consideration cannot be contradicted or shown to be different from that expressed when thereby the…

Tandy v. Smith

The presumption is that he had the real consideration recited therein, and, in the absence of testimony…