From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Dime Savings Bank v. Frohlich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1977
57 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

May 9, 1977


In a proceeding, inter alia, to evict a tenant, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated September 22, 1976, which reversed a judgment of the District Court, Nassau County, Third District, in favor of the appellant tenants and awarded possession and a money judgment to the respondent landlord. Order affirmed, with costs. The appellant tenants were not physically expelled or excluded from the demised premises. Therefore, a partial, actual eviction had not occurred. The tenants cannot claim a constructive eviction since at no time did they abandon the premises. Hopkins, J.P., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Union Dime Savings Bank v. Frohlich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1977
57 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Union Dime Savings Bank v. Frohlich

Case Details

Full title:UNION DIME SAVINGS BANK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH FROHLICH et al., Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 9, 1977

Citations

57 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

S.E. Nichols, Inc. v. Am. Shopping Centers

Even affording the pleadings a liberal construction (see, Raymond Corp. v Coopers Lybrand, 105 A.D.2d 926,…

Scolamiero v. Cincotta

It has not even been shown that tenant's right to the parking space was an exclusive one. But, even assuming…