From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unger v. Compton

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division
Jun 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 6:05cv186 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:05cv186.

June 23, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and a recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that the above-styled lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice. After receiving an extension of time, Plaintiff filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation on June 19, 2006.

Having made a de novo review of the objections filed by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are hereby adopted as those of the Court.

In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (document #86) is DENIED and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (document #81) is GRANTED. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the above-styled lawsuit is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED.


Summaries of

Unger v. Compton

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division
Jun 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 6:05cv186 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Unger v. Compton

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL RAY UNGER v. GREG L. COMPTON, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division

Date published: Jun 23, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:05cv186 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2006)

Citing Cases

Moreno v. McAllen Indep. Sch. Dist.

Nunez Gonzalez v. Vazquez Garced, 389 F. Supp. 2d 214 (D.P.R. 2005). Unger v. Compton, CIV.A. 6:05CV186, 2006…

Bouchereau v. Gautreaux

Additionally, it does not appear that loss of consortium is recoverable for a § 1983 claim. See Brown v. ATX…