From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Under Seal v. Under Seal

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 23, 2012
No. 11-2286 (4th Cir. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-2286

02-23-2012

UNDER SEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNDER SEAL; UNDER SEAL, Defendants - Appellees.

Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Wittman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00056-AWA-TEM)

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Wittman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

The pro se plaintiff/relator in this qui tam suit appeals the district court's orders dismissing his action and denying his subsequent motions to reconsider its ruling. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, though we grant the Plaintiff's pending motion to seal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Under Seal v. Under Seal

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 23, 2012
No. 11-2286 (4th Cir. Feb. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Under Seal v. Under Seal

Case Details

Full title:UNDER SEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNDER SEAL; UNDER SEAL, Defendants …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

Citations

No. 11-2286 (4th Cir. Feb. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Walls

To the extent that Plaintiff is attempting to be the relator in a qui tam action, she may not represent the…

Bryant v. U.S. Secret Serv.

Moreover, it is well-settled that pro se litigants, such as the present Plaintiff, may not represent the…