From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ulmer v. Minster

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1896
16 Misc. 42 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)

Opinion

February, 1896.

Edward Mandel, for appellant.

M.B. Blumenthal, for respondent.


It was conceded upon the trial that the plaintiff was a member in good standing of the unincorporated society known as the L. Strauss Sons Benevolent Association; that he became sick March 9, 1895, and was on that account discharged from the employment of L. Strauss Sons on March 15, 1895. On the following day the defendant paid the plaintiff the sick benefits for the preceding week, but declined to make any further payments. The action is to recover benefits after such discharge and during his entire illness.

Section 15 of the defendant's constitution and by-laws provides that "Should any one, being a member of this association, be discharged from the employment of L. Strauss Sons, for any reason whatever, or leave of his own accord, his membership shall forthwith cease."

The defendant being a voluntary, unincorporated association, composed of the employees of the firm after which it is named, and the plaintiff having subscribed to the constitution and by-laws on becoming a member, he is bound by them, however unreasonable they may seem. Elsas v. Alford, 1 City Ct. Rep. 123.

Since the plaintiff had ceased to be an employee of L. Strauss Sons, and his membership in the association had thereby terminated, before the benefits for which the action was brought accrued, it follows that the defendant owed him nothing, and that the justice properly so decided.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

BISCHOFF, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Ulmer v. Minster

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1896
16 Misc. 42 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
Case details for

Ulmer v. Minster

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN ULMER, Appellant, v . LEOPOLD MINSTER, as President, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1896

Citations

16 Misc. 42 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
37 N.Y.S. 679

Citing Cases

Taufer v. Brotherhood of Painters

This consent appeared from the evidence of the member, and from the assumption that he had become familiar…

Maxwell v. Theatrical Mechanical Assn

In a purely voluntary association, the constitution and by-laws are the contract between the parties; and, if…