From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ulmer v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Apr 11, 2014
3:13-CV-4991-N-BK (N.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2014)

Opinion

3:13-CV-4991-N-BK

04-11-2014

KYLE ULMER, #4262-12, Plaintiff, v. JHONNY BROWN, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 and n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith.

__________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ulmer v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Apr 11, 2014
3:13-CV-4991-N-BK (N.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Ulmer v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:KYLE ULMER, #4262-12, Plaintiff, v. JHONNY BROWN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 11, 2014

Citations

3:13-CV-4991-N-BK (N.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2014)

Citing Cases

Dillon Investment Co. v. Kinikin

The very facts of this case disclose there was and is no controversy with respect to the location of the…

Cummings v. Midstates Oil Corp.

There was a ratification by Cummings and wife of the original lease, as covering 155 acres and excepting no…