From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ullah v. Office of District Attorney

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 26, 2009
07 Civ. 2687 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2009)

Opinion

07 Civ. 2687 (DAB).

August 26, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the July 20, 2009 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein. The Report recommends that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint be GRANTED and the Plaintiff's request to amend his Complaint be DENIED. (Report at 1.)

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), "[w]ithin ten days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b) (stating that "[w]ithin 10 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations"). Despite being advised of this procedure in Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's Report and Recommendation, to date, no specific objections to said Report have been filed.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein, dated July 20, 2009, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety;
2. Upon entry of judgment in favor of Defendants, the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the docket for this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ullah v. Office of District Attorney

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 26, 2009
07 Civ. 2687 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Ullah v. Office of District Attorney

Case Details

Full title:KHAWAJA ZAHID ULLAH, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BRONX…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 26, 2009

Citations

07 Civ. 2687 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2009)

Citing Cases

Hennessy v. Alossa

With respect to claims of malicious prosecution, the Second Circuit has held that the burden of proof rests…

Fogelman v. Donato

Neither an arrestee's protestations of innocence nor a putative victim's inconsistent statements necessarily…