From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 9, 1997
693 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 95-04736

Opinion filed May 9, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Harry M. Rapkin, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Joanna B. Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


In this appeal, the defendant, Robert Tynes, raises three challenges to the sentence imposed upon his conviction for robbery with a firearm. The first two issues have merit. Therefore, we strike the $2.00 discretionary cost, pursuant to section 943.25, Florida Statutes (1995). See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). We also remand for entry of the restitution judgment that was orally pronounced but never entered.

The defendant also contends, for the first time on appeal, that the trial court improperly imposed a three-year minimum mandatory prison term in violation of the plea agreement. This issue is not cognizable on direct appeal because the defendant neither objected below nor moved to withdraw his plea.See Hoskins v. State, 636 So.2d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FULMER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Tynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 9, 1997
693 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Tynes v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT TYNES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 9, 1997

Citations

693 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)