From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TYNER v. AXT

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1931
111 Cal.App. 187 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 336.

January 16, 1931.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Denver S. Church, Judge. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Wakefield Hansen and William C. Crossland for Appellant.

David E. Peckinpah and Bert M. Green for Respondent.


[1] This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The motion is based on the ground that the appellant did not file his brief within the time permitted by the rules of the court. The transcript was filed on October 6, 1930. The time for appellant to file his opening brief expired, therefore, on November 5, 1930. Notice of the presentation of this motion was served and filed December 10, 1930. The motion was noticed for presentation on January 13, 1931, and was presented on that date. On December 12, 1930, appellant's brief was filed. Appellant's attorney has presented and filed an affidavit from which it appears that during the period of his apparent delay he was diligently employed in the trial of various cases. Furthermore, the affidavit shows that the appeal has been taken and presented in good faith and that the delay has not appreciably postponed the hearing of the appeal on its merits. ( Fishman v. Silva, 108 Cal.App. 121 [ 291 P. 430]; Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon Miller, Inc., 109 Cal.App. 333 [ 293 P. 114].)

The motion should be denied and it is so ordered.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred,


Summaries of

TYNER v. AXT

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1931
111 Cal.App. 187 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

TYNER v. AXT

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE TYNER, Respondent, v. RUDOLPH AXT, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 16, 1931

Citations

111 Cal.App. 187 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
295 P. 97

Citing Cases

Toth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

" Furthermore, the affidavit of counsel for appellant shows that the appeal has been taken and is presented…

Snodgrass v. Hand

( In re Ryer, 110 Cal. 560 [42 P. 1082]; Woodside v. Hewel, 107 Cal. 141 [40 P. 103]; Warren v. Hopkins, 110…