From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyne v. Tyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 1947
271 App. Div. 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

February 17, 1947.

Present — Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ. [See post, p. 1018.]


In an undefended action to annul a marriage on the ground of fraud, the matter was referred to an official referee to hear and report. The official referee filed his report, together with findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommending that an interlocutory judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff. The Special Term denied plaintiff's motion to confirm the report, stating that the proof was insufficient to establish the allegations of the complaint, and plaintiff appeals. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. The proof did not establish a prima facie case. The evidence of marital relations of the parties necessitated a holding that the proof as to the alleged fraud was insufficient as matter of law. (See Ferguson v. Ferguson, 271 App. Div. 976.)


Summaries of

Tyne v. Tyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 1947
271 App. Div. 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Tyne v. Tyne

Case Details

Full title:MURIEL H. TYNE, Appellant, v. EDMUND F. TYNE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)