From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Twiss v. Twiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1997
245 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 22, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order entered November 27, 1996, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered July 8, 1997, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered July 8, 1997, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The parties entered into a comprehensive written stipulation settling their matrimonial action. The stipulation was incorporated, but not merged, into the judgment of divorce. The clear and unambiguous terms of the agreement limited the plaintiff wife's distributive share of the defendant husband's deferred compensation plan to the fixed amount of $135,000. The wife also consented to the terms of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which specifically provided that she was entitled to no more than $135,000. Consequently, she is not entitled to any interest or appreciation on that sum from the date of the stipulation or judgment to the date when the money was transferred to her ( see, Keith v. Keith, 241 A.D.2d 820; De Gaust v. De Gaust, 237 A.D.2d 862; Lamberti v. Lamberti, 158 A.D.2d 449).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Twiss v. Twiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1997
245 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Twiss v. Twiss

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES W. TWISS, Appellant v. DONALD L. TWISS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 35

Citing Cases

Weissman v. Weissman

as of right, and we decline to grant leave to appeal where plaintiff signed a stipulation withdrawing his…

Navarette v. Navarette

The defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.…