Argued October 29, 1903
Decided November 10, 1903
Hubert E. Rogers for appellant.
Charles W. Dayton and Joseph E. Bullen for plaintiff, respondent.
Charles P. Rogers for defendants, respondents.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, MARTIN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.
Full title:THE TWELFTH WARD BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . FREDERICK…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 10, 1903
Ordinarily, a renewal note, where the note of which it is a renewal is retained, is merely a continuation of…
Gales v. FrankBut neither has counsel cited, nor have I found, any case which holds contrary to my holding. A veritable…